Communication Between Honest People and Liars (2007.7.20)
There are liars in the world—people who cannot be trusted. Naturally, honest individuals cannot establish meaningful communication with liars. But how many liars are there, really? If we consider this question using a 2×2 matrix, the situation might look like the table below.
| from\to | Honest | liars |
| Honest | good | N.G. |
| liars | N.G. | N.G. |
※This article is an English version of our article dated July 20, 2007, titled (Translated by ChatGPT)
正直者と嘘つきのコミュニケーション/ Communication between honesty and liars: 本に溺れたい
Out of the four possible dimensions, communication fails in three of them. In other words, there is a 75% chance of failure and only a 25% chance of success. And yet, communication in the real world does not appear to be in a constant state of chaos. From this, we may reasonably infer that, at least for the most part, the majority of communicators in everyday life are, in fact, honest.
That said, politics seems to be mired in continual confusion—suggesting that the world of politics may be disproportionately populated by liars.
Speaking more generally, communication between humans can break down even when both parties are honest. This is because, even when neither side intends to lie, the words that form the core of communication are typically used in accordance with each speaker’s own unique context—and they are interpreted according to the listener’s equally unique contextual framework.
Nonetheless, the world continues to function, more or less, because most everyday communication between people remains on a superficial, business-like level. Conversely, the more we strive for deeper communication, the more it becomes necessary for the participants’ individual contexts to be synchronized.
In short, the likelihood of successful communication—even between honest people—depends heavily on the degree of maturity of the “community” formed between the interlocutors. This topic will be addressed in a separate essay.
※Please refer to the following.
ホンネとタテマエのコミュニケーション/ Communication between Honne (an ulterior motive) and Tatemae (principles): 本に溺れたい
| 固定リンク
« Isaiah Berlin’s Philosophy of History and My Position (2020.4.13) | トップページ | Communication Between Honne (an ulterior motive) and Tatemae (principles) »
「知識理論(theory of knowledge)」カテゴリの記事
- 混沌から知識を紡ぐ/ Spinning knowledge out of chaos(2025.12.15)
- 翻訳は文明の界面である――言語の非対称性と「意味の生態系 meaning ecosystem」(2025.11.08)
- Der Mensch kann nicht aus der Sprache heraustreten (Ausgabe Oktober 2025)(2025.10.29)
- Humans Cannot Step Outside of Language (October 2025 Edition)(2025.10.29)
- ひとは言葉の外に出られない(2025年10月版)(2025.10.29)
「abduction(アブダクション)」カテゴリの記事
- 石川 淳「江戸人の発想法について」昭和18年3月/ Jun Ishikawa, “On the Way of Thinking of the People of Edo,” March 1943(2026.04.13)
- 未発の潜勢力としての「Chaos 混沌」Ⅱ/ “Chaos” as a latent force Ⅱ(2026.03.22)
- Charles Sanders Peirce’s assessment of Hegel (2)(2026.03.15)
- Two approaches to emergence(2026.03.15)
- From Max Weber to Jacques Barzun(2026.03.10)


コメント