Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt
I asked ChatGPT the following question and received the following response. I have transcribed it here for your reference.
1) After Arendt
Hannah Arendt’s The Human Condition (1958) is often cited as the first systematic introduction of the sphere of intimacy. For Arendt, intimacy belonged to the realm of necessity (life, reproduction, family) and was opposed to the public sphere (action, speech, politics). Later debates developed along two major directions:
-
Feminist theory (1970s–): Thinkers such as Carole Pateman, Nancy Fraser, and Seyla Benhabib criticized Arendt’s scheme. They argued that the public/private divide is itself politically constructed and that the intimate sphere (family, care) is not “natural” but socially and politically produced.
-
Ethics of care (1980s–): Carol Gilligan and Joan Tronto reinterpreted intimacy as the locus of care and demanded its public recognition, thus reversing Arendt’s “apolitical” definition.
-
Sociology (1990s–): Anthony Giddens (The Transformation of Intimacy, 1992) described intimacy as a “pure relationship” tied to individual self-realization, shifting from Arendt’s “necessity” toward identity formation.
2) Before Arendt
Although Arendt coined the explicit phrase sphere of intimacy, she drew on a long genealogy of thought distinguishing family/private life from public/political life:
-
Aristotle (Politics): distinction between oikos (household, necessity) and polis (public good).
-
John Locke (Two Treatises of Government, 1689): separated paternal power (family) from political power (state).
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Social Contract, Émile, 1762): distinguished natural affection (family) from civic virtue (politics).
-
Hegel (Philosophy of Right, 1821): conceptualized family as a sphere of love and intimacy, leading dialectically to civil society and the state.
-
Tocqueville (Democracy in America, 1835–40): analyzed transformations of family and gender relations in democratic society.
Arendt thus redefined this tradition for the 20th century, providing the groundwork for later feminist, ethical, and sociological debates.
Table: Intellectual Genealogy of the Sphere of Intimacy
| Period | Thinker / Work | View on Intimacy or Private Sphere | Connection to Arendt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antiquity | Aristotle, Politics | Oikos (household, necessity) vs. Polis (public good) | Origin of the necessity/publicity dichotomy |
| Early Modern | John Locke, Two Treatises (1689) | Family (paternal power) separated from political authority | Basis for family as non-political domain |
| Modern | Rousseau, Social Contract / Émile (1762) | Natural affection vs. civic virtue | Intimacy = natural, non-political sphere |
| Modern | Hegel, Philosophy of Right (1821) | Family = community of love and intimacy → civil society, state | Intimacy as a root communal element |
| Modern | Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835–40) | Family and gender under democracy | Intimacy shaped by political institutions |
| 20th c. | Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (1958) | Sphere of intimacy = domain of necessity, opposed to the public | Critical redefinition of public/private |
| Postwar | Feminist theory (Pateman, Fraser, Benhabib) | Public/private divide as power-laden; intimacy as political | Critical continuation of Arendt |
| Postwar | Ethics of care (Gilligan, Tronto) | Intimacy as locus of care, deserving public recognition | Reversal of Arendt’s “apolitical” stance |
| Postwar | Sociology (Giddens, Transformation of Intimacy 1992) | Intimacy as “pure relationship,” identity formation | Intimacy as key to late modernity |
References
-
Aristotle, Politics, esp. Book I–III.
-
John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (1689).
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Du contrat social (1762); Émile (1762).
-
G. W. F. Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1821).
-
Alexis de Tocqueville, De la démocratie en Amérique (1835–40).
-
Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (1958).
-
Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988).
-
Nancy Fraser, Unruly Practices (1989); Justice Interruptus (1997).
-
Seyla Benhabib, Situating the Self (1992).
-
Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice (1982).
-
Joan Tronto, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (1993).
-
Anthony Giddens, The Transformation of Intimacy (1992).
The above is ChatGPT creation (20250826).
| 固定リンク
「思想史(history of ideas)」カテゴリの記事
- Vergleichstabelle Poincaré / Bergson / Peirce(2025.10.30)
- Comparative Table: Poincaré / Bergson / Peirce(2025.10.30)
- ポアンカレ/ベルグソン/パースの比較表(2025.10.30)
- Pierre Legendre vs. Harold J.Berman [English version](2025.10.20)
- Pierre Legendre contre Harold J. Berman [Version française](2025.10.20)
「 political theory / philosophy(政治哲学・政治理論)」カテゴリの記事
- Pierre Legendre vs. Harold J.Berman [English version](2025.10.20)
- Pierre Legendre contre Harold J. Berman [Version française](2025.10.20)
- ピエール・ルジャンドル 対 ハロルド J. バーマン(2025.10.20)
- Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt(2025.08.26)
- 「親密圏」アーレント以後とそれ以前(2025.08.26)
「Seki, Hirono(関 曠野)」カテゴリの記事
- いま「役に立つ」勉強は、いつか本当に役に立つのか?/ Will studying what's “useful” now ever truly be useful someday?(2025.09.09)
- Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt(2025.08.26)
- 「親密圏」アーレント以後とそれ以前(2025.08.26)
- Seki Hirono, „Der Mythos der Präsenz und die Macht des Westens“, November 1984.(2025.06.29)
- Seki Hirono, “The Myth of Presence and Western Power” (November 1984)(2025.06.29)
「Aristotle」カテゴリの記事
- Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt(2025.08.26)
- 「親密圏」アーレント以後とそれ以前(2025.08.26)
- Crossing the contingent sea / Überquerung das Meer der Kontingenzen(2025.04.14)
- コンティンジェント(偶有性)の海を渡ること / Überquerung das Meer der Kontingenzen(2025.04.14)
- 『殺す理由 : なぜアメリカ人は戦争を選ぶのか』/ REASONS to KILL: Why Americans Choose War?, 2010. by R. E. RUBENSTEIN(2024.12.09)
「feminism / gender(フェミニズム・ジェンダー)」カテゴリの記事
- Frauen in den antiken und mittelalterlichen Zivilisationen und die kulturelle Besonderheit Japans(2025.11.17)
- Les femmes dans les civilisations anciennes et médiévales et la singularité culturelle du Japon(2025.11.16)
- Women in Ancient and Medieval Civilizations and the Cultural Uniqueness of Japan(2025.11.15)
- 古代・中世世界における「女性」の社会的地位と日本文化の特異性(2025.11.14)
- Bärte und Modernisierung(2025.09.29)
「vulnerability(傷つきやすさ/攻撃誘発性)」カテゴリの記事
- Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt(2025.08.26)
- 「親密圏」アーレント以後とそれ以前(2025.08.26)
- To Not Lose Hope: "Focus on What You Can Control"(2025.04.20)
- 希望を失わないために:「自分がコントロールできることに焦点を当てる」(2025.04.20)
- 「後期高齢化」社会の現実(2023.08.31)
「Tocqueville, Alexis de」カテゴリの記事
- Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt(2025.08.26)
- トクヴィル史観から内藤〔湖南〕史観へ/ From the Tocqueville view of history to the Naito view of history(2021.07.22)
- トクヴィルのパラドックス/ Tocquebille's paradox(2021.07.20)
- デカルト読まずのデカルト知り/ Are Americans Cartesians?(2021.07.20)
- 明治十二年のトクヴィル(2021.07.19)
「身体論 (body)」カテゴリの記事
- 尊厳ある「死」、あるいは無責任な「生」/ A dignified ‘death’, or an irresponsible ‘life’(2025.12.03)
- Bärte und Modernisierung(2025.09.29)
- Beards and Modernization(2025.09.29)
- 髭と Modernization(2025.09.29)
- Intellectual History of the "Sphere of Intimacy" : before and after Arendt(2025.08.26)
「AI ( artificial intelligence)」カテゴリの記事
- Vergleichstabelle Poincaré / Bergson / Peirce(2025.10.30)
- Comparative Table: Poincaré / Bergson / Peirce(2025.10.30)
- ポアンカレ/ベルグソン/パースの比較表(2025.10.30)
- Alfred W. Crosby, The Measure of Reality (1997, Cambridge University Press)(2025.10.23)
- アルフレッド・W・クロスビー『数量化革命:ヨーロッパ覇権をもたらした世界観の誕生』(小沢千重子訳)、2003年、紀伊国屋書店(2025.10.23)


コメント